Search the SPREP Catalogue

Advanced Search
Refine Search Results

Tags / Keywords

Language

Available Online

Tags / Keywords

Available Online

7 result(s) found.

Sort by

You searched for

  • Tags / Keywords research on priorities
    X
  • Tags / Keywords outreach
    X
clear
Seabird Diversity and Biomass Enhance Cross-Ecosystem Nutrient Subsidies
Island and Ocean Ecosystems, BRB
Available Online

Benkwitt, C.E

,

Carr, P

,

Graham, N.A.J

,

Wilson, S.K

2022
Seabird biomass was particularly important for terrestrial and near-shore subsidies and enhancing fish biomass, while seabird diversity was associated with nutrient subsidies further offshore. The positive effects of diversity were likely driven by high functional complementarity among seabird species in traits related to nutrient storage and provisioning. However, introduced rats and non-native vegetation reduced seabird biomass and diversity, with rats having a stronger effect on biomass and vegetation having a stronger effect on diversity.
InvaCost, a Public Database of the Economic Costs of Biological Invasions Worldwide
Island and Ocean Ecosystems, BRB
Available Online

Assailly, C.

,

Courchamp, F.

,

Diagne, C.

,

Gozlan, R. E.

,

Jarić, I.

,

Jourdain, F.

,

Leroy, B.

,

Nuninger, L.

,

Roiz, D.

,

Vaissière, A.-C.

2020
Biological invasions are responsible for tremendous impacts globally, including huge economic losses and management expenditures. Efficiently mitigating this major driver of global change requires the improvement of public awareness and policy regarding its substantial impacts on our socio-ecosystems. One option to contribute to this overall objective is to inform people on the economic costs linked to these impacts; however, until now, a reliable synthesis of invasion costs has never been produced at a global scale. Here, we introduce InvaCost as the most up-to-date, comprehensive, harmonised and robust compilation and description of economic cost estimates associated with biological invasions worldwide. We have developed a systematic, standardised methodology to collect information from peer-reviewed articles and grey literature, while ensuring data validity and method repeatability for further transparent inputs. Our manuscript presents the methodology and tools used to build and populate this living and publicly available database. InvaCost provides an essential basis (2419 cost estimates currently compiled) for worldwide research, management efforts and, ultimately, for datadriven and evidence-based policymaking.
Global Economic Costs of Aquatic Invasive Alien Species
Island and Ocean Ecosystems, BRB
Available Online

Ahmed, Danish A.

,

Angulo, Elena

,

Briski, Elizabeta

,

Capinha, César

,

Catford, Jane A.

,

Cuthbert, Ross N.

,

Dalu, Tatenda

,

Diagne, Christophe

,

Essl, Franz

,

Gozlan, Rodolphe E.

,

Leroy, Boris

,

Pattison, Zarah

,

Taylor, Nigel G.

,

Verbrugge, Laura

2021
Much research effort has been invested in understanding ecological impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) across ecosystems and taxonomic groups, but empirical studies about economic effects lack synthesis. Using a comprehensive global database, we determine patterns and trends in economic costs of aquatic IAS by examining: (i) the distribution of these costs across taxa, geographic regions, and cost types; (ii) the temporal dynamics of global costs; and (iii) knowledge gaps, especially compared to terrestrial IAS. Based on the costs recorded from the existing literature, the global cost of aquatic IAS conservatively summed to US$345 billion, with the majority attributed to invertebrates (62%), followed by vertebrates (28%), then plants (6%). The largest costs were reported in North America (48%) and Asia (13%) and were principally a result of resource damages (74%); only 6% of recorded costs were from management. The magnitude and number of reported costs were highest in the United States of America and for semi-aquatic taxa. Many countries and known aquatic alien species had no reported costs, especially in Africa and Asia. Accordingly, a network analysis revealed limited connectivity among countries, indicating disparate cost reporting. Aquatic IAS costs have increased in recent decades by several orders of magnitude, reaching at least US$23 billion in 2020. Costs are likely considerably underrepresented compared to terrestrial IAS; only 5% of reported costs were from aquatic species, despite 26% of known invaders being aquatic. Additionally, only 1% of aquatic invasion costs were from marine species. Costs of aquatic IAS are thus substantial, but likely underreported. Costs have increased over time and are expected to continue rising with future invasions. We urge increased and improved cost reporting by managers, practitioners and researchers to reduce knowledge gaps. Few costs are proactive investments; increased management spending is urgently needed to prevent and limit current and future aquatic IAS damages.
SPREP Webinar series | Rats, Reefs and Resilience (full session)
SPREP Publications, Climate Change Resilience, Island and Ocean Ecosystems, BRB
Available Online

Pacific Regional Invasive Species Management Support Service (PRISMSS)

2021
The Battler Lounge webinar series talks about the link between rats, seabirds, ecosystems and reef resilience in the Pacific.
Biological Invasion Costs Reveal Insufficient Proactive Management Worldwide
Island and Ocean Ecosystems, BRB
Available Online

Andrew M. Kramer

,

Anna Turbelin

,

Christophe Diagne

,

Céline Albert

,

Danish A. Ahmed

,

Elizabeta Briski

,

Emma J. Hudgins

,

Franck Courchamp

,

Franz Essl

,

Melina Kourantidou

,

Natalia Kirichenko

,

Phillip J. Haubrock

,

Rodolphe E. Gozlan

,

Ross N. Cuthbert

,

Thomas W. Bodey

2022
The global increase in biological invasions is placing growing pressure on the management of ecological and economic systems. However, the effectiveness of current management expenditure is difficult to assess due to a lack of standardised measurement across spatial, taxonomic and temporal scales. Furthermore, there is no quantification of the spending difference between pre-invasion (e.g. prevention) and post-invasion (e.g. control) stages, although preventative measures are considered to be the most cost-effective. Here, we use a comprehensive database of invasive alien species economic costs (InvaCost) to synthesise and model the global management costs of biological invasions, in order to provide a better understanding of the stage at which these expenditures occur.
Biodiversity increases ecosystem functions despite multiple stressors on coral reefs.
BRB

Benkwitt, C E.

,

Graham, NAJ

,

Wilson, S K.

2020
Positive relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (BEF) highlight the importance of conserving biodiversity to maintain key ecosystem functions and associated services. Although natural systems are rapidly losing biodiversity due to numerous of human-caused stressors, our understanding of how multiple stressors influence the BEF relationships comes largely from small experimental studies.
Going to scale: reviewing where we’ve been and where we need to go in invasive vertebrate eradications
Available Online

Hagen, E.

,

Holmes, N.

,

Howald, G.

,

Keitt, B.

,

Poiani, K.

2019
We are on the edge of the sixth mass extinction on Earth. Islands represent ca. 5% of the earth’s land area yet are home to 61% of extinctions in the past 500 years, and currently support 39% of critically endangered species. Invasive species are a leading cause of extinction and endangerment on islands. Invasive vertebrates, particularly mammals, are among some of the most damaging invasive species on islands. Eradicating invasive mammals is an increasingly utilised conservation tool. Nevertheless, conservation intervention needs greatly outstrip the island restoration community’s capacity. There are thousands of islands where invasive vertebrates are driving species toward extinction. So, how can the effort be matched to the scale of the problem? One approach is to improve outreach and communications to increase the resources available for projects. There are great stories; but these need to be told compellingly and repeatedly. Increasing social acceptance and support for invasive species eradications will reduce project costs associated with stakeholder engagement. Broadening the funding base can be accomplished by building stronger cost benefit valuations as well as engaging funders of climate change, marine conservation, human wellbeing, and food security. Furthermore, it is important to build upon existing partnerships to create or grow coalitions that can access these resources as part of broader, holistic efforts to address multiple conservation issues.

www.sprep.org © 2021 - 2024. All rights reserved

Login